Health Problems

The Colon

2008-12-22T12:50:00.000-08:00

In the past decade, health has taken the spotlight in personal priorities. Perhaps caused by the new slew of illnesses and diseases in the past years, society has given more focus and importance to health. From products to advertisements, there has been a shift in focus. Now, more than ever, consumers have more options when it comes to food items. New types of diets have come along, some of which cater to a whole myriad of things ranging from weight loss to keeping bowel movements regular.

One of the areas that have boomed during this focus on health is alternative medicine. The Oriental way of treating illness and disease, taking herbs, meditation, yoga, and even colon cleansing have gained popularity as alternative treatments to sickness.

Anatomy: Where and What Is The Colon?

As part of the digestive system, the colon plays an important part in regulating fecal matter in he body. The colon serves as a tube where solid matter from feces is stored. It is also responsible for keeping the balance between feces and water, giving it an integral role in bowel movement. Mammals' colons have four parts: the ascending colon, transverse colon, the descending colon, and the sigmoid colon. The colon is also divided into two areas: the right colon (from the cecum to the splenic fluxure and) and the left colon.

The colon is part of the large intestine, which is mostly responsible for waste removal. Fittingly, the large intestine stretches as long as 1.5 meters. The large intestine's function varies a bit differently in every kind of animal, but generally, it's the area where waste goes. It also manages water and vitamin balance as well as vitamin absorption.
On its own, the colon could be as long as 6 feet. It is further divided into five different areas, whose last part (before the anus) is the rectum.

Its primary function is to move feces, or undigested matter, from the small intestine to the large. It also functions as a sponge of sorts during the digestion. While the small intestine focuses on getting nutrients from the food, the remaining matter is moved to other parts of the digestive system by the colon. In the process, the colon could also absorb water and remove harmful substances while moving “leftovers” of the small intestine.

You Probably Shouldn't Eat That
The secret to knowing how fast a colon moves waste and absorbs water and nutrients is to check bowel movement. A regular one probably means a healthy colon. However, almost everyone has been a victim of constipation or diarrhea. Though these happen once in a while, chronic constipation and diarrhea might be a sign of something more serious.

As they say, food is a reflection of one's character and nothing proves this more than the colon. Material from fatty food or junk may remain lodged up in the gastro-instestinal tract, especially if one's diet does not focus in food that allow healthy bowel movement.

Processed food, red meat, chips, candy, soda, and even too much coffee or soda could wreak havoc on a well-functioning digestive system.

On the other side of the spectrum, fruits, vegetables, whole wheats and grains, and food rich in fiber are the best types of foods for a well-maintained colon. These foods have minerals and nutrients that are beneficial to easy bowel movement.

The British Nutrition Foundation has released a statement regarding diet fiber. Last year, the agency streamlined the definition of dietary fiber and listed potential health benefits of dietary fiber consumption. It said:

Diets naturally high in fiber can be considered to bring about five main physiological consequences:

improvements in gastrointestinal health

improvements in glucose tolerance and the insulin response

reduction of hyperlipidemia, hypertension and other coronary heart disease risk factors

reduction in the risk of developing some cancers

increased satiety and hence some degree of weight management

Therefore, it is not appropriate to state that fiber has a single all encompassing physiological property as these effects are dependent on the type of fiber in the diet. The beneficial effects of high fiber diets are the summation of the effects of the different types of fiber present in the diet and also other components of such diets. Defining fiber physiologically allows recognition of indigestible carbohydrates with structures and physiological properties similar to those of naturally occurring dietary fibers.
One's fiber needs is dependent on his or her age. Men who are 50 years old or younger need 38 grams of fiber everyday while those who are older are advised to have 30 grams. Women aged 50 and below need 25 grams of fiber, while those older are advised to get 21 grams daily.

Colon Cleansing: Beneficial or Detrimental?
As divided as the medical community is when it comes to alternative medicine, so are health and fitness enthusiasts about colon cleansing. Over the past few years, the colon has been singled out as an organ that should be kept health as the rise of colon cancer steadily rose throughout the years.

The American Cancer Society has found that colorectal cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer in the U.S. Ranked third, there are 108,070 estimated new cases of colon cancer for 2008. Rectal cacner, on the other hand has a projection of over 40,000 cases. Together, both cancers are projected to claim 49, 960 lives.

Though the number of new cases might be alarming, the NCS also reports that death rates are going down. For 15 years, colorectal cancer related deaths have gone down as fewer cases have been reported. Due to colorectal screenings, cancerous polyps can be detected earlier and patients are given treatment as soon as the cancer is detected.

Supporters of colon cleansing claim that regular cleaning of the colon could hel further in preventing colorectal cancer. They also claim that even the smallest problem in bowel movement could spell serious problems in the long run. Non-elimintaion of feces build up toxins, which spread to the body, thereby the cause of various forms of diseases. From skin allergies to irritable bowel syndrome, colon cleansing is said to treat various diseases.

On the other hand, there are those who say that colon cleansing is an unneccessary procedure created by companies who want to sell colon cleaning products. They say that the body has an existing system which eliminates toxins and that colon cleansing and detoxing are just fads.

The question still remains: is colon cleansing good or does it cause more harm? Though there are health practitioners who recommend colon cleansing for overall health, there are those who warn against its dangers. Primarily, they argue that taking pills or teas to cleanse the colon is unneccessary as it is its main function anyway. Also, colo cleaning can be harmful as some products are so strong that they strip the gastro-intestinal tract of good bacteria that is essential in digestion and absorption of food. This causes an electrolyte imbalance thereby making one dehydrated. In the long run, they say colon cleansing could cause anemia, heart failure, and malnutrition.

Treatment For Trichotillomania Home Study Course. Click Here!

Quit Smoking Today.The Amazing Quit Smoking Today System Package. Click Here!

Hynosis To Cure - Procrastination, Motivation, Fibromyalgia, Public Speaking, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder And Many More.. Click Here!

Extremely Effective Way To Stop Smoking As It Quickly Gets Rid Of Cravings. Click Here!

Quit Smoking Marijuana Easily, Without Withdrawals And Cravings. Proven Results! Click Here!

How To Give Up Alcohol.Product Is Unique On Market To Include Hypnosis,Modern And Clinically Tested Techniques To Address Alcohol Issues. Click Here!

Stop Sugar Cravings And Lose Weight Naturally. Sugar Cravings Can Destroy Your Best Intentions When It Comes To A Healthy Diet. Click Here!

Stop Stuttering Secrets New Product*. Click Here!

Stop Compulsive Picking New Product* * Click Here!

End Your Internet Sex Site Addiction.An Easy To Read Book On Resolving An Addiction To X-rated Movies And Pictures. Written By A Psychology Graduate And Includes Bonus Video Program. Click Here!

Anorexia- Bulimia. A Step By Step Program To Cure Anorexia And Bulimia At Home That Is Proven To Work. Click Here!

Hypnosis Scripts, Hypnosis CDs, Nlp CDs, Hypnosis Ebooks, Nlp Ebooks. Download Hypnotherapy Scripts, Hypnosis Scripts Download, Hypnosis E-books, Hypnotherapy E-books, Nlp E-Books Download, Hypnosis Mp3 Download Audio Cd - Quit Smoking, Weight Loss, Confidence, Write Hypnosis Scripts. Nlp And Hypnotherapy Training Course. Click Here!

Beat Eczema. All Natural Eczema Cure. Click Here!

SleepTracks Sleep Optimization Program. Number 1 Sleep And Insomnia Solution Click Here!

The Ultimate Rotator Cuff Training Guide. Physical Therapist Reveals How To Fix Rotator Cuff Pain And Shoulder Stiffness. Click Here!

Herbal Remedies For Better Health. Offering The Complete Health Guide To Self Healing.Shows You How To Treat many Diseases with Herbs Click Here!

Ultimate Frozen Shoulder Therapy Guide. Physical Therapist Reveals Proven Treatment For Frozen Shoulders. Click Here!

Parkinsons Disease: Best-Selling Book On The Internet. Click Here!

The Diabetes-Reversing Breakthrough. The Most Effective Diabetes-Reversing Resource Currently Available On Planet Earth. A Scientifically Proven Program That Normalizes Your Blood Sugar And Eliminates Your Diabetes Drugs And Insulin Shots! Click Here!

One Click Away From Instant Relief. The Remedies Are Hiding Right In Your Kitchen. Click Here!

Stop Herpes Now, And From Coming Back. Natural Medicine Solution For Herpes Sufferers. Click Here!

Treating Ringworm Fast. All Natural Cure For Stopping Ringworm In Its Tracks. Click Here!

The Alzheimers-Reversing Breakthrough *New Site Click Here!

Information Technology and Health Care

2008-12-22T12:37:00.000-08:00

Think back to the last time you planned a business trip or family vacation. You called up your favorite travel agent, and after a few minutes on hold, scheduled an appointment to meet with him in his office across town. When your appointment day arrived, you spent a few minutes describing the vacation you'd like to plan, and he pulled out stacks of dusty paper catalogs, one for each airline, destination city, and activity you described. Several of the catalogs were a few years out of date, but you didn't want to be rude by mentioning it. Together you spent a good hour on the telephone dialing numbers out of your agent’s Rolodex, making reservations, and jotting confirmation numbers down on your legal pad. You pulled out your checkbook several times, writing individual checks to each airline and hotel, and left with several pages of handwritten notes documenting the itinerary and transactions. Over the next week, your paper airplane tickets and handwritten confirmation of your accommodations all arrived in the mail, some containing errors you had to call your travel agent’s assistant to correct. When you arrived at the airport, you presented your paper tickets to the airline’s agent, who looked you up in the fat stack of printed reservations for that day, and matched yours to the handwritten list of flight numbers on the large whiteboard behind her. As you boarded the aircraft, you were comforted to see how carefully the pilot and copilot were planning the route with their protractor and the Thomas Guide.

Is this not exactly how you plan your travel? Would you continue to give your business to that travel agent or fly that airline? Despite the enormous technological and intellectual sophistication that is the modern practice of medicine, information continues to be recorded, stored, and communicated in largely paper-based systems that should be the embarrassment of any major industry. The reasons for medicine’s long laggard status in information technology are complex. However, in recent years the imperative to move health information in to the digital age has gained the national spotlight.

Electronic Health Records

Beginning in 2004, three consecutive State of the Union addresses included a line naming an electronic health record for all Americans as a national goal. The administration established the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology to promote the adoption of modern information systems in health care nationwide, with particular emphasis on the ability of health care providers to share information electronically. The policy is motivated by the belief that replacing paper health records with electronic records will make health care delivery better, safer, and less-expensive, as digital record-keeping and communication has in other industries.

One historic reason for the underuse of information technology in health care has been that the market for clinical software was dominated by niche vendors with limited money and personnel to invest in software development, at least relative to the major computer and software companies. The last few years have seen dramatic changes in this situation, with several of the largest brand name software companies making forays into health information technology. To help make the choice of software easier, software companies have partnered with national health care organizations and the Department of Health and Human Services to create certifying criteria for clinical software. The Certifying Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT ) uses a consensus process to create a set of voluntary, annually updated criteria that software companies can choose to have their products tested against in the hopes of receiving the CCHIT seal of approval.

For clinicians, clinics, and hospitals, the hardest part of implementing an electronic health record is not choosing or installing the right software, it is adapting the way work gets done to the new tools. Many software systems have been installed only to be used incompletely or not at all, because of either an under-appreciation of how difficult it is to adapt clinical work without interruption, or because the necessary expertise was not obtained. For large hospitals and networks of clinics, it is feasible to directly hire clinicians with a background in information technology and information technology professionals with experience in health care to jointly lead a successful clinical software rollout. For smaller practices, consultants can be hired on an as-needed basis, although the expense can still be substantial. The considerable investments in software and specialized expertise required for a small hospital or small practice to implement an electronic health record continues to be one of the most important barriers to wider adoption of modern information systems, and whether this instead should be funded regionally or nationally is a topic of ongoing debate.

For patients, the benefit of doctors or hospitals using an electronic health record is in knowing that your important health information will be available whenever it is needed. Although having a doctor seated at a computer while talking about a your health history might feel awkward or intrusive, studies have shown patients view this positively as long as the physician is skilled at focusing their attention on the patient, and avoiding letting the computer interfere with the quality of the conversation. A shared computer screen in the exam room or at the hospital bedside can facilitate the patient and the physician looking at information together, which can help patients understand their health status, and make sure the information maintained by the clinician is correct.

Communication Among Electronic Health Records

Imagine if the local branch of your bank was the only place your financial information was stored, on paper, and it was the only place you could go to obtain cash or make a deposit. This approximates the current state of the interoperability of health records. Presently, if someone becomes suddenly ill or is injured and is brought to the nearest emergency room, very likely no information will be available to the doctors and nurses beyond what that ill person and their family can provide, even though the patient's primary physician’s office might be just down the street.

As electronic health records become more widely used, the opportunity to share electronic records between health systems increases. Although such sharing raises important questions for the security and privacy of health information, well-established regulations exist. A number of large national healthcare provider networks do have integrated national health records for their members, but even these leading systems are closed to any provider outside that system. The current national policy approach to this challenge is Regional Health Information Organizations, or RHIOs, which are locally operated voluntary information exchanges among cooperating health systems. Although there have been a number of promising initiatives, there have also been a number of significant and disappointing failures, and the extent to which RHIOs will be a viable solution remains to be seen.

The most progressive electronic health records have a “patient portal” feature, allowing patients to connect to their health records just like they connect online to their bank or the airlines. After much controversy surrounding the possible risks of having patients reading medical jargon they may not fully understand, the accumulating experience suggests the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Patients have a greater opportunity to be informed partners in their health management, and to update or correct information that may be out of date, such as medications they no longer take or old health problems that have resolved. Patients also have the opportunity to view and book appointments online, request medication refills electronically, and read medical references assembled for them by their health care providers.

Personal Health Records

Despite substantial progress in electronic health records, health information remains an anomaly among vital personal information, in that it continues to be maintained and controlled by an outside party rather than the person themselves. No homeowner would imagine not having a copy of the title to their home or the registration for their car in their possession, yet personal health information is seldom in the possession of the person to whom it is most important. The reasons are largely historical rather than conspiratorial – the medical record began as physicians’ personal notes about the care of his or her patients, as reminders to themselves for when they next saw the patient. In a time of country doctors, small community hospitals, and there being not much that medicine could offer in any event, it made sense. With patients now seeing a multitude of primary care providers and specialists, traveling widely, and with medicine now enormously powerful and complex, the model of health information being maintained by clinicians and institutions is being questioned.

Personal Health Records, or PHRs, have existed in some form for decades, but the last few years have seen a sharp increase in interest and availability. PHRs are available that live on a USB flash drive and can be carried on one’s person, or that can be burned onto a CD or DVD, or that exist on secure Internet servers and can be accessed like a web page. The principal challenge is the willingness of health care providers to adopt and collaboratively maintain these records, and whether health care providers will find them satisfactory for their own purposes. If in effect multiple records need to be maintained – a PHR controlled by the patient and separate paper or electronic records by the providers of care – the completeness and accuracy of the information may not necessarily improve. Several initiatives are trying to solve this by establishing electronic communication links between the PHR and the other sources of electronic information, but remain in development.

Electronic Prescribing and Clinical Decision Support

Although it has been many years since the major airlines routinely issued paper airplane tickets, the majority of prescriptions in the United States are still handwritten on slips of paper. Unlike air travel, where the airline that you chose flights from is the same entity from which you purchase the ticket and that provides you the travel, the doctor who writes your prescription usually has no relationship to the pharmacy that will actually fill it. Prescriptions therefore must be communicated using a technology that is the lowest common denominator between physicians and pharmacies, and this usually means paper.

Physicians’ bad handwriting is a running joke, but is a real and important problem and a source of well-documented dangerous mistakes in filling prescription medications. Furthermore, regardless of good handwriting, a paper prescription has no connection to the rest of the information known about a patient, including other medications they may be taking or drugs they are allergic to. Although physicians check for both of these problems when writing a prescription, mistakes are easily made, and often the information available to the physician is incomplete.

The best solution would be electronic medical record systems that can truly communicate with one another, so that all necessary information would be available at all times. The physician could write prescriptions in this electronic system, have the prescription automatically checked against the patient's allergies and for interactions with other medications, and have this new prescription electronically available to any pharmacy the patient might choose to fill it. This ideal electronic prescribing situation remains a long way off. In the interim, there is a competitive marketplace for intermediary systems that can receive prescription information from a variety of electronic medical records, maintain an internal list of the patient's medications and allergies, and communicate this to pharmacies that subscribe to the service.

Computerized Provider Order Entry and Clinical Decision Support

The benefits of electronic prescribing in the hospital setting may be even greater. In hospitals, the physician is mostly an indirect provider of the actual physical care of a patient. Although the physician is responsible for diagnosis, the treatment plan, and directing the care, that direction mostly consists of writing out instructions, referred to as “orders”, for the various nurses, respiratory therapists, physical therapists, and other professionals who provide most of the direct care of the patient. Historically the orders have been written in hand on paper, and in the complex hospital environment with sometimes very sick patients, the risks of unsystematic handwriting are magnified. Software systems that allow physicians to write the orders electronically, known as “computerized provider order entry” or CPOE, have the potential to eliminate handwriting errors, speed communication among the various providers of care, integrate with other electronic systems that assure the accuracy of medication dispensing and delivery, and provide physicians with complex decision support to help assure the highest quality care. Over the last 10 years, a great deal of national attention has focused on promoting adoption of computerized provider order entry systems. Several large health care delivery systems have had considerable success, and there have been a few spectacular failures. However, implementing a CPOE system is a major challenge, both from a technology standpoint and in the re-engineering of the work processes of the hospital. Entering orders into a computer is usually more time-consuming than scrawling a few words on a piece of paper. However, the efficiency can be increased by the careful use of predefined sets of orders and excellent user interface design.

Once physicians are writing orders electronically, the opportunity exists to provide “clinical decision support”, a term that simply means helping the physician do the right thing under the circumstances and avoid mistakes. Checking to make sure a patient is not allergic to a medicine or that it does not have dangerous interactions with other medications is easy to computerize. More advanced systems can provide physicians with the most current guidelines for the patient's situation, or update the physician with recent advances in the field applicable to that medication. By integrating with insurance systems and with public agencies that pay for healthcare, the computer can help the physician choose medications that would be more affordable to the patient or that are covered by the health plan, eliminating paperwork and potential saving the patient money.

Another key challenge is “alert fatigue”, a phenomenon first well-described in the F4 Phantom fighter aircraft. When the number of lights, alarms, and buzzers providing information or warnings of a dangerous situation becomes more than the pilot – or the physician – can take in at once, the brain starts tuning them out. Furthermore, if the warning systems are overly sensitive, providing unnecessary alerts under routine circumstances, the physician learns by experience to ignore them. Alert fatigue already exists in hospitals in the case of the warning alarms that constantly ring from heart monitoring systems, where in order to avoid missing any dangerous abnormality, the system rings for every bit of electrical interference or when the patient rolls over in bed. Over time, less attention is paid to the alarms altogether. Finding the appropriate balance in a CPOE system between providing physicians with the right kind of information and warnings when they are needed, without numbing them to alerts altogether, remains an open problem.